| Trade Investment |    7651 VIEWS  |
| Trade Investment | |
| 7651 VIEWS | |
 |
Tuesday, March 27, 2018 07.17AM /
by Reuben Abati
The Extraordinary session planned for the first
quarter of 2018 at which a decision is to be communicated in this regard, has
not yet taken place, but Morocco’s proposed membership has already generated
much interest across the sub-region. In Nigeria, for example, the Joint
Committees on Foreign Affairs and Co-operation for Africa on November 15, 2017,
organized a one-day public hearing titled “Public Hearing on the Review of
Nigeria’s Membership of ECOWAS in view of Morocco’s bid to be admitted into the
Regional Body.” Some of the arguments advanced at that event and which may have
influenced Nigeria’s lack of clarity so far on the Morocco question are at best
ridiculous.
It was argued for example that if Morocco joins
ECOWAS, Nigeria will disintegrate. How? Nigeria is a member of the D-8 and the Organisation
of Islamic Countries (OIC); it has not disintegrated on account of that. No
member-country of ECOWAS is in a position to disintegrate another country for
whatever reason under the Constitutive protocols. It was also said, and
this really exposes the hypocrisy involved, that Nigeria should block Morocco
because it is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. This is not true.
Morocco’s corruption perception index has consistently improved while Nigeria’s
CPI continues to worsen. Nigeria has no moral right to condemn any other
country on the ground of corruption, and if this were a criterion for
international relations, many countries including Nigeria would have been
expelled from the United Nations long ago. It was further argued at that forum
and in the Nigerian media that “any attempt to allow the North African country
to join ECOWAS will subvert Nigeria’s economic prosperity.”
The evidence given in this regard is that Morocco is
an associate of the EU under the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP). And:
Nigeria having refused to sign the ECOWAS-Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
with the European Union could become a dumping ground for cheaper goods from
Europe through Morocco, thus crippling investments across the sub-region. Our
response is that in the long run, ECOWAS member-states in general, would have
to strengthen their capacity to compete and be productive, rather than hide
under protectionist policies. One other ridiculous excuse that has been given
is that ECOWAS owes its existence and survival to Nigeria and that Nigeria
should not allow any new country to reduce its control over ECOWAS. It is
precisely this kind of undiplomatic talk that continues to make other countries
in ECOWAS suspicious of Nigeria’s motives and unappreciative of the country’s
contributions to the regional body. Other non-sequitur arguments raised
by Nigerians include the Western Sahara issue or that Morocco is a monarchy,
rather, a parliamentary constitutional monarchy.
What is required is a dispassionate study of Morocco’s
application, even of similar applications from Tunisia, which is seeking an
observer status in ECOWAS and Mauritania, which left in 2000 but now wants to
return. Technically, those opposed to Morocco’s membership have advanced two noteworthy
arguments so far but even then, both can be interrogated. The first is the
argument about contiguity. They insist that Morocco is not contiguous with any
West African country and may not meet the geographical criterion as defined in
the Council of Ministers Resolution/Res 464 (XXVI) of the OAU, 1976, which
divides Africa into 5 geo-political regions namely Northern, Western, Central,
Eastern and Southern Africa. In this regard, Morocco is classified as a North
African country along with Algeria, Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia. Further, Article
1 of the revised ECOWAS Treaty of July 24, 1993, defines members of ECOWAS as
countries within the geographical region known as West Africa. So, how
about Mauritania?
However, it is clearly within the powers of the ECOWAS
Heads of State and Governments to determine that geography cannot debar an
interested African country from joining ECOWAS. Economic and political
considerations should override geography that is merely nomenclatural,
particularly if the applicant-countries are within Africa. Opening up ECOWAS
beyond geographical boundaries would be more in keeping with the long-term goal
of the AU, which is the creation of an African Economic Community (AEC) that
promotes the integration and cooperation of the various regional blocs in the
continent. Incidentally, this is the growing global trend. For example, Egypt,
Tunisia and Libya are members of the Common Market of Eastern and Southern
African States (COMESA). Algeria has also submitted its accession applications
to this economic body. Integration is not uncommon. The Community of Saharan
States (CEN-SAD) cuts across ECOWAS, ECCAS, COMESA and UMA countries. The D-8
is an economic association of development countries in Africa, Asia, the Middle
East and South America. To push the counter-argument a bit further, if
geography were the sole issue, ECOWAS by now should have long admitted
contiguous countries like Sao Tome and Principe, Equitorial Guinea, Chad and
Cameroon which have also expressed interest in ECOWAS membership.
The other major argument on the Morocco question is
whether or not the country would commit to the principles of the revised ECOWAS
Treaty. ECOWAS can afford to insist on its principles and objectives. It is,
after all, one of the most successful regional groupings in Africa. In pursuit
of its Africanism agenda, and perhaps to demonstrate its interest and
commitment, Morocco has consistently identified with ECOWAS principles. Even
without yet being a member, Morocco has since established strong ties with
Mali, Senegal, and Mauritania, which are exempted from entry visas to Morocco.
The country is also strongly involved with Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Guinea
Bissau, and Mali where it provides support for agriculture and healthcare
systems. The objection to Morocco by certain Nigerians should in fact be
investigated closely. It is on record that Morocco and Nigeria are
involved in a gas pipeline project, the Morocco-Nigeria gas pipeline; there is
also a BASA agreement, which unfortunately, Nigeria currently lacks the will to
utilize.
Both countries are also partners in a phosphate
project in Kaduna. Some states in Nigeria have also signed co-operation
agreements with Morocco, notably Bauchi state which is partnering with the
OCP-Group of Morocco in agriculture and fertilizer production. OCP is the
largest exporter of phosphate in the world. While some Nigerians are busy
arguing whether Morocco is good for ECOWAS or not, the truth is that many
Nigerians are already benefitting from Moroccan partnerships. There are
3,000 documented Nigerians currently living in Morocco – 195 of them are in
prison. There is even a gallery of African Arts in Morocco featuring many
Nigerian art works. There are also Nigerian students quietly enjoying scholarships
in Moroccan colleges. At the level of person-to-person diplomacy, there are
Nigerians doing business in Morocco, making huge profits. Take sardine, that
variety of fish Nigerians enjoy, and import from Europe. Morocco has one of the
largest troves of sardines in the world along its Continental shelf on the
Atlantic all the way to the island of Sardinia in Italy from which the fish
takes its name. It is cheaper to bring in fish from Morocco than to import from
Europe! Morocco is the world’s leading producer of Sardines.
I have given these details just in case the vocal
anti-Morocco lobbyists in Nigeria are doing so for their own selfish purposes.
My suspicion really, is that there is a growing body of anti-trade lobbyists,
and greedy rent-collectors, who want Nigeria isolated from the rest of the
world and who are actively doing whatever they can to seize and exercise an
undeserved monopoly over Africa’s largest market. Right now, 40 European and
African organizations are opposing the Nigeria-Morocco gas pipeline project,
actively encouraged of course by Nigerian economic dream-blockers.
Membership of ECOWAS comes with both costs and
benefits for Morocco. It is the second largest investing country in
Africa after South Africa, with a GDP of about $100 billion, and according to
Quantum Global Research Report 2018, “the most attractive economy for
investments in Africa.” ECOWAS membership will grant it access to a market of
about 320 million consumers, but it would also result in an influx of ECOWAS
immigrant population. Morocco would be obliged to respect the free movement of
such persons and of goods within the region, adopt the ECOWAS passport and join
the Common External Tariff (TEC). Here is the trade-off: Morocco’s direct
investment in ECOWAS has doubled between 2011 and 2017, from MAD 295 million to
over 2 billion. This can only grow higher.
When it comes to the vote on the Morocco question, Nigeria should prioritize its own interests and not the selfish and emotional preference of a few. Foreign policy requires greater rigour and creativity than we have seen lately in Abuja. It is a blunder for example, I repeat, that President Muhammadu Buhari stayed away from the Extra-ordinary session of the AU in Kigali on the African Continental Free Trade Area Treaty, the same treaty that had been approved and endorsed by the Federal Executive Council (FEC), just because some unionists screamed that they were not consulted. Did Nigeria not participate in the negotiations of the treaty? An ad-hoc, knee-jerk management of foreign policy will only make us look more ridiculous in the eyes of the world.
Related Posts by Author – Dr. Reuben
Abati
Related News
Signup with Facebook
Signup with Twitter
