| Regulators |    1778 VIEWS  |
| Regulators | |
| 1778 VIEWS | |
 |
The UK financial system is resilient to the wide range of risks it could
face, including Brexit.
Highlights
1. Stress testing: Our stress test shows that UK banks could
continue to lend in a scenario more severe than the financial crisis.
2. Bank resilience: UK banks are prepared and strong enough to
continue to serve UK households and businesses even through a disorderly
Brexit.
3. Brexit checklist: The UK government is making sure the financial services UK households and businesses get from EU providers won’t be disrupted.
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) aims to ensure the UK financial
system is resilient to, and prepared for, the wide range of possible risks it
could face — so that the system can serve UK households and businesses in bad
times as well as good.
The 2018 stress test shows the UK banking system is
resilient to deep simultaneous recessions in the UK and global economies that
are more severe overall than the global financial crisis and that are combined
with large falls in asset prices and a separate stress of misconduct costs.
In the 2018 stress-test scenario, UK GDP falls by
4.7%, the UK unemployment rate rises to 9.5%, UK residential property prices
fall by 33% and UK commercial real estate prices fall by 40%. The scenario also
includes a sudden loss of overseas investor appetite for UK assets, a 27% fall
in the sterling exchange rate index and Bank Rate rising to 4%.
Major UK banks have continued to strengthen their
capital positions. They started the 2018 stress test with an aggregate common
equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio nearly three and a half times higher than
before the global financial crisis.
Despite facing loss rates consistent with the global
financial crisis, the major UK banks’ aggregate CET1 capital ratio after the
stress would still be twice its level before the crisis.
All participating banks remain above their
risk-weighted capital and leverage hurdle rates and would be able to continue
to meet credit demand from the real economy, even in this very severe stress.
The 2018 stress test is the first to be conducted under a new accounting standard, International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9). The test results take account of internationally agreed transitional arrangements. The Bank will use these results to assess how best to avoid the interaction of IFRS 9 and the stress test leading to an unwarranted de facto increase in capital requirements, as these transitional arrangements are phased out.
Since the EU referendum in 2016, the FPC
and other authorities have identified risks of disruption to the financial
system that could arise from Brexit and worked to ensure they are addressed.
Stress tests and supervisory actions have ensured major UK banks have levels of
capital and liquidity to withstand even a severe economic shock that could be
associated with a disorderly Brexit. The Government is taking forward the
legislation necessary to avoid disruption to financial services provided by EU
firms to UK households and businesses. The Bank, other UK authorities and
financial companies have engaged in extensive contingency planning.
The FPC has reviewed a disorderly Brexit scenario, with no deal and no
transition period, that leads to a severe economic shock. Based on a comparison
of this scenario with the stress test, the FPC judges that the UK banking
system is strong enough to continue to serve UK households and businesses even
in the event of a disorderly Brexit.
The UK economic scenario in the 2018 stress test of
major UK banks was sufficiently severe to encompass the outcomes based on
‘worst case’ assumptions about the challenges the UK economy could face in the
event of a cliff-edge Brexit.
These worst case assumptions include: the sudden
imposition of trade barriers with the EU; loss of existing trade agreements
with other countries; severe customs disruption; a sharp increase in the risk
premium on UK assets; and negative spillovers to wider UK financial markets.
Because major UK banks would be resilient to the
tougher annual stress test, they would also be resilient to, rather than
amplify, this disorderly Brexit scenario.
Major UK banks have sufficient liquidity to withstand
a major market disruption.
Major UK banks have sufficient liquidity to withstand
a major market disruption. Since the financial crisis, major UK banks have
substantially reduced their reliance on wholesale funding. At group
level, they hold more than £1 trillion of high-quality liquid assets.
They are able to withstand more than three months of stress in wholesale funding
markets.
As a result of supervisory actions and their own
prudent risk management, major banks have aligned the currency of their liquid
assets to that of their maturing wholesale funding. They can now
withstand many months without access to foreign exchange markets.
In addition, banks have pre-positioned collateral at the Bank of England that would allow them to borrow a further £300 billion. The Bank is able to lend in all major currencies.
Most risks of disruption to the financial services
that EU firms provide to UK households and businesses have been addressed,
including through legislation. Further UK legislation, currently in train, will
need to be passed to ensure the legal framework for financial services is fully
in place ahead of Brexit.
The Bank, other UK authorities and financial companies have engaged in
extensive contingency planning.
Legislative preparations in the UK have progressed further. In November,
Parliament passed legislation to allow Temporary Permissions and Recognition
Regimes. These will allow UK households and businesses to continue to access
financial services provided by EU firms.
The FPC welcomes the European Commission’s recent statement that it is
willing to act to ensure that EU counterparties can continue to clear
derivatives at UK central counterparties (CCPs) after March 2019.
However, without greater clarity on the scope, conditions and timing of
the prospective EU action, the contracts that EU members have cleared with UK CCPs
would need to be closed out or transferred by March 2019 — a process that would
need to begin in December 2018.
Irrespective of the particular form of the UK’s future relationship with
the EU, and consistent with its statutory responsibilities, the FPC will remain
committed to the implementation of robust prudential standards in the UK. This
will require maintaining a level of resilience that is at least as great as
that currently planned, which itself exceeds that required by international
baseline standards, as well as maintaining more generally the UK authorities’
ability to manage UK financial stability risks.
CCyB
The FPC is maintaining the UK countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) rate
at 1%. It stands ready to move the UK CCyB rate in either direction as the risk
environment evolves.
If an economic stress were to materialise, the FPC is
prepared to cut the UK CCyB rate, as it did in July 2016. This would enable
banks to use the released buffer to absorb up to £11 billion of losses, which
might otherwise lead them to restrict lending. Given losses of that scale, a
cut in the UK CCyB rate to zero could preserve their capacity to lend to UK
households and businesses by around £250 billion. This compares to £65 billion
of net lending in the past year.
The FPC judges that, apart from those related to
Brexit, domestic risks remain at a standard level overall. Lender risk appetite
is strong but, reflecting uncertainty, demand for credit has been muted. Were
that uncertainty to fade, credit demand could rebound significantly and lead to
an increase in the riskiness of banks’ exposures. Given current accommodative
lending conditions, that could require a timely policy response to ensure
resilience.
Leveraged lending to businesses has grown rapidly,
both globally and, more recently, in the UK. Strong creditor risk appetite,
including for securitisations of leveraged loans, has loosened underwriting
standards materially. However, UK banks’ holdings of these securitisations are
very small and their aggregate exposures to leveraged lending were covered in
the Bank’s 2018 stress test.
The rapid growth in leveraged lending has been driven
by increased securitisation activity through collateralised loan obligations
(CLOs), as well as demand from investment funds. Given the decline in
underwriting standards, investors in leveraged loans are at increasing risk of
loss.
CLOs are held mainly by non-bank investors. Although
international banks hold around a third of the outstanding stock of CLOs, UK
banks and insurance companies only hold a very small share of the stock.
Rapid growth of leveraged lending means that higher-risk borrowers account for more of the stock of total UK corporate debt. However, UK banks’ domestic corporate lending does not reflect a material shift towards higher-risk borrowers
Global debt
Risks to UK financial stability from global debt vulnerabilities are
material. Reflecting that, the FPC incorporated a very severe global stress in
the 2018 stress-test scenario.
Global financial conditions have continued to tighten
since June. Global equity markets have fallen and credit spreads have risen.
A further deterioration in Italy’s financial outlook
could result in material spillovers to the euro area and the UK.
Financial conditions in emerging market economies have
shifted from accommodative to tightening. Debt levels in China remain highly
elevated. A sharp slowdown in growth in China — possibly as a result of an
escalation of trade tensions with the US — would make its elevated debt levels
significantly less sustainable.
The FPC has completed an in-depth assessment of the
risks associated with leverage from the use of derivatives in the non-bank
financial system. Risks of forced sales to meet derivative margin calls
currently appear limited. However, more comprehensive and consistent monitoring
by authorities is needed to keep this under review.
Non-bank leverage can support financial market
functioning, but it can also expose non-banks to greater losses and sudden
demands for high-quality collateral, which could result in forced sales of
potentially illiquid assets.
The FPC’s assessment focused on the capacity of
non-banks in the UK to cover the posting of variation margin on
over-the-counter interest rate derivatives. Most non-banks appear to have
sufficient liquid assets to meet such calls.
The Bank will work with other domestic supervisors to enhance the monitoring of these risks. Internationally, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has issued a consultation paper on how to operationalise the Financial Stability Board’s (FSB’s) recommendation to develop consistent leverage measures for funds. For IOSCO to deliver the objective of the FSB recommendation, the FPC considers that a core set of measures will need to be consistent globally and enable effective monitoring of the potential losses and liquidity demands funds could face.
Related Link
Download the Financial Stability Report
Related News
1.
Beginning
Stress Testing’s New Chapter - An Intl’ Perspective On The Future Of Bank
Stress Testing
2.
No
Bank Was Referenced By CBN as NOT being Compliant with 30% Minimum Regulatory
Liquidity Ratio
3.
CBN
Reschedules November 2018 MPC Meeting to 21st and 22nd
4.
Three
(3) Commercial Banks Fall Short of The Minimum Regulatory Liquidity Ratio of
30% – CBN
5.
Brexit
and the Global Economy
6.
Brexit
Deal Agreed Between EU and UK – A Look At What Was Agreed To In Brussels
7.
MSCI
Releases Its 2018 Semi-Annual Index Review
8.
A
New Chapter In Stress Testing – The Fed
9.
Supreme
Court Of Canada Validates The AMF’s Role As An Integrated Regulator
10. Fed
Proposal Expands GSIB, Regional Bank Regulatory Gap
11.
EBA
Stress Test - Banks Are More Resilient To Financial Shocks, Barclays and Lloyds
Are Laggards
12. Eurozone
Bond Market to See Major Shift as ECB QE Ends
13. MSCI
Bolsters Capabilities With A Suite of ESG Screened Indexes
14. The
European Banking Authority Announces Timing For Publication Of 2018 EU-Wide
Stress Test
15.
Communiqué
Of The Thirty-Eighth Meeting Of The IMFC
Signup with Facebook
Signup with Twitter
