Proshare - Facebook Proshare - Twitter Proshare - Google+ Proshare - Linked In Proshare - RSS Feed

Nigeria Needs More Policies and Less of Politics

Proshare

Thursday, November 09, 2017 / 9:40 AM /FDC

 There are very few things as riveting as national elections in Nigeria. Sadly, one of the most common characteristics of Nigerian elections is the lack of detail of prospective policies from politicians, compounded by poor analysis from the media. 

Politicians often make pledges to fight corruption, create jobs and achieve impactful economic growth. However, they stop short of providing details of substantive policies that can be criticized or held accountable to their campaigns. 

In turn the media feeds these superficial campaigns, spending more time on personalities, religious and tribal affiliations than it does on pressuring politicians to bring substance to the table. As a result, voters do not get to debate them on details such as funding for proposed budgets, labor market reform, restructuring etc. 

A more mature democracy would have checked these electoral frailties, but in Nigeria, neither voters nor politicians seem ready for change. Citizens need to demand more from the political class. The focus of political discourse needs to shift from “what” will be done, to the more critical “how” it is going to be done. 

Same goal, different strategy

Mature democracies understand the role of party manifestos in their campaigns, and traditionally present policies in line with their ideologies. The last U.S election was arguably one of the most contentious and divisive elections in the country’s modern history. Both of the main candidates made similar pledges to make “America great again” but as they say, the devil is usually in the details.

 

A good distinction was their respective positions on tax reform. President Donald Trump pledged to cut taxes for all income brackets, while Hilary Clinton wanted to raise taxes for high income households.

 

The goal in both cases was to boost the economy by putting more money in the hands of the people. Both candidates had different “hows” to the same “what”. They tabled their arguments about the financial costs to government and benefits – short and long term – to the citizens. The end game is to improve welfare. Voters in the U.S as well as politicians are cognizant of this and the ability to better articulate the ‘how’ is usually where elections are won and lost.

 

Globally, some of the most crucial yardsticks for measuring political performance are jobs and inflation. The Misery index captures this. It measures economic well being by adding seasonally adjusted inflation to the rate of unemployment. History has shown that, a rising misery index typically reduces the likelihood of the incumbent being reelected.

 

The misery index has accurately predicted nine of the last thirteen elections in the U.S. Informed voters are simply much more sensitive to the economy and the “how” of making it better for even future generations.

 

The Nigerian voting culture is different but not for the right reasons. Such details of economic or foreign policy do not motivate the average Nigerian voter. A significant proportion of the electorate would rather vote along religious and ethnic lines.

 

Many politicians do not recognize the need to show up to publicly televised debates to properly articulate their policies. Perhaps because they know Nigerians are typically moved by grandiose promises; the more ambitious, the greater the appeal. A Nigerian political manifesto seldom includes details like '5% cut in the tax rate for those with annual incomes below N1 million for the next five years, to be funded by increased VAT on luxury goods from 2019'.

 

To stand a better chance of winning at the polls, the Nigerian politician would rather pander to jostling that come with the elections. Not enough attention is given to details of past or proposed policy. And even when the past is considered, it is done with a focus on grand infrastructure projects.

 

The Turning Point

A number of questions do arise. How did mature democracies become mature? Do democracies simply just become more mature with time or is there a catalyst to this transition?

 

The answers lie in the accountability nexus between democratic representation and taxation. The well-established connection is simple. No taxation without representation. The higher the taxation, the greater the reason for taxpaying citizens to demand good governance.

 

In the same way, the lower the level of taxation, the less likely citizens will demand representation. Taxation therefore, stands as the anchor for democracy and democratic accountability

 

Nigeria is a textbook case of limited state dependence on taxes leading to bad governance outcomes. At approximately 6% of GDP, Nigeria’s tax revenues are one of the lowest in the world. Decades of a reliance on petrodollars engendered a culture where governments had little incentive to be accountable, responsive, or efficient. Worse still oil rent meant less need for tax revenues and no need to secure large tax bases or enforce tax compliance over the years.

 

However, for Nigeria, the plunge in oil prices and the accompanying revenue shortfall may just have come with a silver lining – renewed aggression in tax collection and broadening the tax base. Perhaps the time has finally come for the Nigerian voter to hold the politicians to a higher standard.

 

A shift to Ideology

Aside from the obvious benefit of demanding that our politicians present more than impractical promises, comprehensive policies allow citizens to align their desires of advancing their economic welfare with the economic ideologies of political parties.

 

For a change, voters will be more likely to identify along policy lines rather than tribal lines that is Southern voters may find themselves in agreement with a Northern politician on his/her position on the national minimum wage or education reform or even resource control. The opportunity this approach offers is one where citizens embrace their similarities and differences on issues other than ethnicity and religion.

 

Taxation may not be a silver bullet, but perhaps the shift to a dependence on tax revenues will alter the political discourse and uplift the level of policy discussion that will transform the polity. The voting taxpayer must simply demand that it does.

 

Related News

1.       The Untapped Power of Citizens in Governance

2.      Senate calls for Adequate Financial Provision for NEDC in 2018 Budget

3.      Saraki: NASS Working to Increase Private Sector Participation in Economy

4.      Southern Governors Forum 2017: 5 Key Takeaways

5.      Senate Passed a Motion on the Need for Intervention in the Etisalat NG $1.2bn Debt Crisis

6.    Rochas Okorocha and Jacob Zuma’s Statue

READ MORE:
Related News