Monday, March 12, 2018
8:37 AM / By Bunmi Ogunmodede of The Nation (Title edited)
Those kick against the implementation of the revised
LUC Act appears to be no more than people living with the fear of the harmless,
experts have said. To them, the outrage over the law reviewed by the
administration of Governor Akinwunmi Ambode to bridge infrastructural deficit
in Lagos State, is uncalled for, reports BUNMI OGUNMODEDE.
What the LUC Law 2018 is all about
In simple term, the law repeals an earlier one of
2001, therefore, it is not new. It also consolidated ground rent, tenement rate
and neighbourhood improvement levy, therefore, Lagosians would not be
victims of multiple taxations under the new law.
The law went through the required legislative processes before it was passed
which included a public hearing where those now crying could have ventilated
their apprehensions; this process brought a number of reliefs that were
embedded in the law.
Who Pays What?
• If you are a landlord and you are the only one
living in your house with your family (no tenant). Your annual fee is 60 per
cent of the value of the house × 0.076. For instance, if your house is valued
at N20 million. Your fee is 0.076 per cent of (60 per cent of N20 million) is
0.076 per cent x N12 million which is N9, 120.00 per annum.
• If you rented out the house to tenants only and you don’t live there and the
house is worth N20 million. You will pay 0.76 per cent of (60 per cent of N20
million) is 0.76 per cent of N12 million is N91, 200.00
• If you are a landlord living with your tenant in the same building of the
above value. You will pay 0.256 per cent of (60 per cent of N20 million) is
0.256 per cent × N12 million is N30,720.00
If the computations of the revised Lagos State Land
Use Charge (LUC) Act 2018 are anything to go by, the controversy trailing it
may not be unwarranted. The law, which was enacted in 2001, with a provision
for review every five years, was not reviewed until 2017, 15 years after its
According to the government, the upward review of the
LUC Law was to increase the state’s internally generated revenue and expand its
tax base. But the ambitious intention of the government drew flaks from a
section of the society.
Critics of the revised law, especially property
owners, want the government to roll back the review over fears that its
implementation would adversely affect their businesses.
But, the government said there was no cause for alarm
as the augmentation on owner-occupier property was marginal. It explained
that the review was done in line with the prevailing economic realities and in
the overriding interests of the future of Lagos as a mega city.
At a parley with business executives last week,
Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, explained to property owners what informed the
review, adding that his doors were opened to dialogue.
Not a few stakeholders blame the misgiving of some
residents on the dearth of communication and education of tax payers before the
government unveiled its plan to commence the implementation of the revised law.
One of the captains of industry at the governor’s
parley with business executives, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, the Group President of
Dangote Group, said the business environment in the Centre of Excellence was
friendlier than what obtained in others states.
Speaking at the forum tagged: “Lagos means business”,
Dangote described Ambode’s explanation as a demonstration of his passion to
take the state to loftier heights.
He said the economic drive by the government was one
that required the support of all and sundry by performing their civic
responsibility of paying their taxes as and at when due.
Dangote said: “I am more convinced now and I think
people should really be voluntarily paying taxes in Lagos. I think for the
people who are doing business here, Lagos is the most-friendly states in
Nigeria. If you really want to know, try other states and you will see…
“I am not advertising for Lagos but there is not a
single time you go with a problem and the governor will ask you to go and come
back tomorrow because in most cases, he will call everybody and say let us sit
down and sort out the issues. So, your Excellency, we congratulate you and
assure that we will continue to support you.”
A tax expert, Taiwo Oyedele, appealed to the
government to improve its communication and engagement with stakeholders on the
revised LUC Law. He spoke of the need for the government to do more explanation
on how it worked and computed the new rates to prevent misinterpretation and
Oyedele, the Head of Tax & Regulatory Services,
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Nigeria, spoke with the News Agency of Nigeria
(NAN) in Lagos at the weekend.
He said: “Government needs to communicate better and
engage people more. May be the implementation from when the law was announced
was too quick and people did not have enough time to digest it.
“It is important for government to clarify and
simplify the computation so that an average property owner can compute it
without any external assistance.
“There are lots of miscalculations and misinformation
on the social media because people do not understand how to calculate it.
“On a N100 million worth of an owner-occupied
property, you would pay less than N50, 000 per annum.
“If the N100 million property was for commercial
purpose, that is you are renting it out, you would pay about N200, 000.
“Effective communication for development is necessary
to amplify voice, facilitate meaningful participation and foster social
change,” the tax expert said.
Also yesterday, the Centre for Public
Accountability (CPA) threw its weight behind the government, saying the
outrage over the new law was uncalled for.
In a statement by its Executive Director Olufemi
Lawson, the CPA said the Ikeja Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)
erred by issuing the Ambode-led administration a seven-day ultimatum to
reverse itself on the LUC Act.
It said the professional body threw etiquettes into
the wind by offering itself as mouthpiece for those it classified as “tax
The statement reads: We, at the Centre for Public
Accountability (CPA) as well as our civil allies across the nooks and
crannies of Lagos State are concerned at the implications of recent outcry and
what we observe, as the crocodile tears being shed by a seemingly privileged,
social segment of the Lagos State populace on the implementation of Land Use
Charges Law, 2018.
“The most comical of these groups, is the Nigerian Bar
Association (NBA), Ikeja Branch, that has thrown professional etiquettes to the
winds, abandon its well-cherished traditions as the defender of the less
privileged and socially alienated to become the mercenary megaphone of some
over pampered, higher middle class perpetual public tax evaders.”
The CPA described as condemnable the purported threat
by the Ikeja branch of the NBA to call its members out on the streets should
the government refuse to roll back the law by this week.
It said: “Our take up point in this brief
intervention would be to condemn in unmistaken terms, reports in the news
media, particularly that of The PUNCH newspaper of Thursday, 8th, 2018
where a purported seven-days ultimatum was issued to the Lagos State Government
by one, Mr. Adeshina Ogunlana, the Chairman, NBA, Ikeja branch to reverse the
Land Use Charge Law, 2018. An act that was never a product of arbitrary
proclamation of the state governor!
“It is a great wonder that learned men of the legal
profession cannot simply take the civilised means of rectifying of perceived
social injustice by approaching the competent court of law to seek judicial
pronouncement on the law, but rather gentlemen of the legal profession are threatening
fire and brimstone to take laws into their own hands by disrupting law and
other in the state.
“We unequivocally condemn the plan of Ikeja NBA to
cause public riot in the state if the law is not reversed. Need we
remind the NBA, Ikeja Branch, that other well-meaning Lagos civil
society organisations like ours are at liberty to rally round our
members to equally protest the attempt of the Bar to instigate chaos in the
“We recall that the NBA, under the late Alao
Aka-Bahorun and Olisa Agbakoba played progressive roles while lawyers like the
late Kanmi Ishola-Osobu and Chief Gani Fawehinmi always tilt towards the
majority poor and not a minority, few privileged cabals.”
“It is trite in law to re-emphasise that equity
does not aid the indolent who sleep on their rights. It also put in place a
defined, scientific and progressive tax system that weighs heavily on the upper
class of the society who do not always want to pay tax. Since over 15 years
that the law was first enacted, despite astronomical inflationary index, the
minimum charge in 2001 was N1,200 (One Thousand and Two Hundred Naira) and in
2018, it is N5,000 ( Five Thousand Naira), it is only the super-rich with
exotic properties in choice locations like Lekki Peninsula, Ajah, Victoria Garden
City, most of whom are rentier owners with suspicious means of income yet that
are paying more because of the progressive nature of the charges.
“The proceeds accruing from these charges are
statutorily bound to be shared between the Lagos State Government and the 57
Local Government Areas and Local Council Development Areas to finance the
infrastructural deficit of the fast-growing mega city.
“The law set out self-assessment criteria for property
owners and established a Land Use Charges Assessment and Appeal Tribunal
(LUCAAT). The charge rate’ self-evaluation process is as simple as
“Clearly, this fact speaks for itself that the aim
of the law is to ensure that properties are properly and progressively valued
with a lesser burden on the less-privileged. It should be added that the value
of properties also varies from one location to the other”.
LUC Act with a Human Face
• A general 40 per cent relief for all property
liable to LUC payment, a 10 per cent relief for owners and occupiers with
persons with disabilities.
• A 10 per cent relief for owners
and occupiers of 70 years and above.
• A 10 per cent relief for
properties above 25 years, a five per cent relief for properties occupied
by their owners for over 12 years,
• A 20 per cent relief for
non-revenue generating federal and state government property
• 20 per cent partial relief for
non-profit making organisations.
• Pensioners, churches, mosques,
palaces, public places are exempted.
Why the Fuss
To the CPA, the super-rich and the elite have been
crying wolf where there was none.
It said: “CPA notes that it has become a norm in our
country that most privileged individuals in our country only want to benefit
maximally from the society without giving anything back as a birthright.
“Most elected politicians usually run to procure tax
certificates when they are vying for elections which means they don’t pay taxes
unless when it becomes highly imperatives.
“In the same manner, even private companies deduct
taxes from and other statutory deductions like pensions, health and housing
schemes from employees but don’t remit same.
“The public sector is even worse, they make the
deductions and loot them into private accounts, the cases of the alleged
scandals in the pension funds and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NIHS)
are still very fresh in our minds.
“It is in the character of Nigerian upper-middle class
to illegally corner wealth and store same in tax haven as has been
revealed with the Panama Papers and other mind-boggling revelations of
Nigerians try to evade paying appropriate taxes.
“The Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, is
presently leading a Federal Government campaign on Voluntary Assets and Income
Declaration Schemes (VAIDS) to encourage notorious tax evaders to pay within a
clemency period or face stiff penalties and prosecution.
“Every rational person knows that tax is a fundamental
means for government to raise resources to meet up with the provision of social
amenities that make life more amenable to the citizens.
“The LUC Law is only unique to the extent that it
aspires to progressively tax the more privileged citizens to help in providing
humane living environment for the less privileged.
This is however not accidental, the government has
over the years provided good ultra-modern environments for people living in
areas like the Lekki Peninsula, Ajah, Ikoyi and Victoria Garden City, now the
same government is asking people who have properties in these places to pay
quality and commensurate land use charges so that other areas of the State like
Ajangbadi, Ikorodu, Ajegunle can be upgraded.
“We call on all Lagosians to join hands at ensuring
that even when there is en-even development in various areas of the state, that
there is also a combined development whereby, those areas that are more
socio-economically advanced give a helping hand to bring up areas that are
“This is the main social kernel of this LUC
Act; it is a tip of social redistribution of growth and social equity to
all. The super-rich should stop crying wolf and pay up.”
Souce: The Lagos State land Use Charge – The True Story – The Nation, Mar 12, 2018
- Institute of Estate
Surveyors and Valuers React to New LASG Land Use Charge
- LCCI urges Lagos Govt to
suspend new Land Use Charges
- Questions Arise Over
Insertions Of AlphaBeta Consulting LLP Into Lagos Land Use Act
- LASG Land Use Charge: A
Civil Option And Strategic Cause of Action
- Vehicles and Properties
- The New Land Use Charge
Law of Lagos State
- Lagos State House of
Assembly Passes Land Use Charge Bill
- Deed of Gift - Estate and