Now Reading:

Rejoinder: Classism is Social Activists' Forgotten Prejudice - Ahmed Sule

General	1283 VIEWS
General
1283 VIEWS

Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / 09.17AM / OpEd By Ahmed Olayinka Sule, CFA* / Header Image Credit: Twitter

Dear Jemima,

I read with interest your article titled, "Classism is social activists' forgotten prejudice" published in the 2 December 2020 edition of the Financial Times. You argue that to be a white working-class male is often a marker of underprivilege. You note that while all sorts of bigotry are shunned, "Ridiculing someone for their lack of education, or for their social class, often appears to remain acceptable." You also suggest that social activists are not accepting of the plight of white working-class men as they see, "whiteness, cisgenderness and maleness as the ultimate privileges." Furthermore, you state that the prevalence of the cancellation culture makes it difficult to make class issues the primary discriminatory factor relative to racism and sexism.

Your article rests on three faulty pillars - First, it restricts the so-called working class to a particular race and gender. Second, it affirms the humanity of the so-called white working-class man while overlooking the humanity of so-called non-white working-class men and women. Third, it ignores the role white elites have played racialising the working-class to maintain power. I will address these flaws in the next couple of paragraphs.

In writing this piece, you join a long list of thinkers and politicians from the Global North such as Owen Jones, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Angus Deaton in whitewashing the working class as a "Pale and Male" collective group. In his book titled Chavs- The Demonization of the Working Class, Owen Jones mentions white working-class sixty times while black or Asian working-class does not get a single mention. Likewise, in your op-ed, which discusses classism, the words "white" and "male" gets mentioned seven and four times, respectively. The well-worn argument among white thinkers that if you are not working-class if you are black, Asian, Roma or female needs rethinking.

It does not have to be a case of either classism or racism/sexism, as you suggest. Why can't it be both/and? After all, these strands of discrimination are not mutually exclusive. When we narrow our discussion on classism to only white men, we get a whitewashed understanding of what class discrimination is. Similarly, the focus on gender diversity to the exclusion of racial diversity has led to a situation whereby the patriarchal structure in corporate Britain is now morphing into a white matriarchy that excludes women of colour. Furthermore, the focus on white working-class men would suggest that sizeable portions of non-whites are part of the elites when this is not the case.

Without a doubt, the so-called white working-class men are getting the wrong side of the stick as you pointed out in your article. However, when one takes other ethnicities out of the class analysis, the suffering by the non-white working class goes unaddressed. The Racial Disparity Audit released by the British Government demonstrates that the non-white working class is at the bottom of the class totem pole. According to the report, Asian and Black households and those in the Other ethnic group were more likely to be poor and were the most likely to be in persistent poverty. It also states that Black, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi people are more likely to live in areas of deprivation. Black adults were more likely than adults in other ethnic groups to have been sectioned under the Mental Health Act. In contrast, of those receiving psychological therapies, White adults experienced better outcomes than those in other ethnic groups.

Despite these glaring disparities highlighted above, it is the suffering white working-class that gets the attention of the media, politicians, and academia partly because the humanity of white working-class male is placed at a higher pedestal than the humanity of the non-white working-class.

You cite a Princeton study, which reveals that "Middle-aged white working-class males' "deaths of despair" have driven a decline in US life expectancy." The ongoing opioid crisis devastating white communities across America has got the attention of the political, academic and media class. In response to the tens of thousands of Americans dying of drug overdose every year, the US Government declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency in 2017. The Trump Administration secured $6 billion in new funding over a two-year window to fight opioid abuse. In the following year, the US Congress passed the single most extensive legislative package addressing a single drug crisis in US history.

In contrast to the recent opioid crisis, the US government declared War on Drugs during the crack epidemic of the 1980s, which led to the demonisation and criminalisation of the black and Latino working-class. In a paper titled, The War on Drugs That Wasn't, Julie Netherland and Helena Hansen note, "To date, we have seen no move to similarly criminalise white suburbanites for their illegal use of prescription opioids and heroin, even though the scope of this epidemic far exceeds that of crack in the 1980s and 1990s." As the black working-class languish in American and British prisons for possessing and supplying cannabis, white investors are lining their pockets via the launching of multimillion-dollar cannabis funds.

From the Trans-Atlantic Slavery era up to the 21st century, white elites have used the white working class as pawns to maintain their power and white supremacy. White and non-white working-class have both got the short end of the stick in the Global North economic order. However, the power elites result to the old divide and rule to keep the two classes separate to eliminate the existential threat the working-class combination could pose to their hegemony.

During the time of slavery, the wealthy plantation owners utilised the services of white working-class overseers to keep the slave plantation running. The overseer directed the work of the slaves and meted out punishment on the black slaves. The Western labour union has a long history of discriminating against ethnic minorities. In Britain, following the immigration of the Caribbean's in the late 1940s, the white working-class organised labour union joined hands with employers in restricting job opportunities to black workers. As Lee Jasper puts it, the white working-class has "Also been the Labour aristocracy of the world for years at the expense of other nations. White privilege means they expect, and will be treated differently, to their Black and Asian neighbours."

Today, the diversionary tactics used to divide the working class along colour lines takes a different form. Politicians and western pundits often use classism and the invocation of the white working-class man as a red herring to silence the non-whites quest for racial justice. When black working-class boys cry out for being criminally profiled, all we hear is, "It's time to give white, working-class boys a fair shot in life.

White elites sometimes suggest that ethnic minorities cause the woes faced by white working-class. They present a zero-sum argument by linking "white pain" with "black gain". For long, the white elites deceived the white working-class into believing that their whiteness meant they had more in common with the white elites than the non-white working-class. Isabel Wilkerson in her book Caste notes, "If the lower-caste person manages actually to rise above an upper-caste person, the natural human response from someone weaned on their caste's inherent superiority is to perceive a threat to their existence, a heightened sense of unease, of displacement, of fear for their very survival... The malaise is spiritual, psychological, emotional. Who are you if there is no one to be better than?"

It is somewhat confusing when western politicians and thinkers push the narrative that it was the white non-college-educated people who voted for Donald Trump. They argue that his message resonated with the poor, non-college-educated white working-class men as if there is no non-white working-class. Paradoxically, the exit polls of the 2020 US election reveal 72% of white protestant, 56% of white Catholics, 61% of white men, 55% of white women, 53% of white youths, 58% of white, middle-aged, 51% of white men college graduates and 45% of white women college graduates voted for Trump - yet media pundits spend their energy asking why the white working-class flocked to Trump. As Ta-Nehisi Coates notes, "The focus on one subsector of Trump voters-the white working class-is puzzling, given the breadth of his white coalition. Indeed, there is a kind of theater at work in which Trump's presidency is pawned off as a product of the white working-class as opposed to a product of an entire whiteness that includes the very authors doing the pawning."

Rather than framing classism in competition with racism and sexism and setting the white working-class against the non-white working class perhaps it is time for white pundits and politicians to focus on revamping neo-liberal policies such as austerity, offshoring, predatory lending, deregulation, labour flexibility, financialisation and tax cuts for the wealthy which have contributed to the hierarchy of classes.

Selah.

About the Author

Ahmed Olayinka Sule is a CFA Charterholder, photojournalist and social critic. He is an Alumnus of the University of Arts, London; where he obtained a Certificate in Photojournalism. He has worked on various photojournalism projects including Obama: The Impact, Jesus Christ: The Impact, The Williams Sisters etc. He can be contacted via e-mail at suleaos@gmail.com and via Twitter @Alatenumo