What Does It Mean That Independent Directors Accuse Diamond Bank Of Corporate Governance Issues?


Monday, December 10, 2018    03:25AM / By News & Investigations


The stories around DIAMONDBNK Plc has been one that in one breadth shows deference to the genius of Pascal Dozie to create a bank of such sophistication and appeal; at the time he did it and one that shows resolve about the conviction around the angst about the bank managed long after he left. Truth is that these two positions are not mutually exclusive as it would appear that Pascal Dozie never really left, qualitatively and quantitatively.


In the realm of corporate governance history, founders with family affiliations take the credit for growth, profit and viability; and are presented as virtues if not as evidence of sound sustainability plans properly executed. This clime has very few of such examples and that offers us a good starting point to access risk or the absence of such an acknowledgement in the evolution of the board (a subject of serious intent that, on its own, requires a separate section in the Proshare Confidential looking at The Diamond Bank Papers.


In the narrative that has dominated the public space, attention has been placed on the drama rather than the substance. We seek to refocus the market on the natural intent of actions and in the main, the real issues for an integrity laden market.


Proshare Markets, in part fulfillment of its mandate had retained a watching brief since May 2018 when it became aware of the possible dichotomy between the public representations about the bank and the realities, that served as the underlying basis of its existence/license.


The work covered in the main:

  • the nature of and definition of the problems faced by the bank beyond its non-performing loans,
  • the strategic advantages the bank/brand had and its viability in a Tier 2 challenged market,
  • the construct and dynamics of the board and ability to address the challenges, and most importantly,
  • its impact on financial system stability.


These matters have attracted over 200 hours of interviews with relevant stakeholders, document collation and data analysis; including the detailed review of management accounts, CBN reports and published statements. This process remains on-going even after the preliminary submissions of findings. We believe we should take all necessary steps to reconcile gaps, differences and presentation issues we have observed before publication; especially given the level of cooperation received in the course of the work.


It is natural that there would be interest in developments in and around a bank like Diamond Bank Plc for a myriad of reasons and being thorough would be a minimum requirement.


However, in the last one week, we became aware of a series of communication(s) and exchanges that required (if not necessitated) a shift in our approach/attitude (if not the entire process) in order to fulfill the shareholder protection mandate that underpinned our watching brief.


Specifically, we became aware of and validated the existence of a November 15, 2018 letter from the Chairman of Diamond Bank Plc to The Committee of Governors, Central Bank of Nigeria which shed more light on the information already in the public space and provided background information (context) on what truly transpired in the bank’s board sessions.


It is instructive that (and as we will reveal in our report); the Company Secretary ofDIAMONDBNK Plc has up till now not allowed an unfettered access or insight into crucial board meeting minutes for board members, regulators and superintending authorities, hence we could not independently corroborate some claims. We have however since cross-checked the information with individual evidence (memory and electronic); even as we will hold out on a definitive statement till we eventually get a copy of the minutes; giving the bank the required benefit of doubt and regard.


That said, the need to now share  the aforesaid letter was compelled by the information/contents about discussions around the possible acquisition of the bank by Access Bank Plc at a board meeting which was denied by both publicly traded entities in public statements issued on the bourse. Contrary to the impression given, it has since been discovered that there was a presentation made by a 3rd party firm engaged by and championed by the chief executive on the subject to the board.


That the bank has been fined and paid same to the local bourse is a trite issue; given that the exchange is currently looking into (investigating) the substance of the letter below as it relates to it (as the issues relating to Diamond Bank covers at a minimum the CBN, SEC, NSE and CAC; discounting concerns from other entities like the IFC for example).


In the spirit of full disclosure therefore, we present below (ad-verbatim) the correspondence between the independent directors and the central bank of Nigeria for the information of the market. Other disclosures, timelines, and corporate governance issues that should interest discerning stakeholders will be covered in the concluded part of the N&I report.


The Governance Concerns - Letter



This letter is written without prejudice and is intended as an instructive, unvarnished, and factual rendition of the truth, for posterity sake. My overall and irrevocable interest remains ensuring the reversal of the declining fortunes of DIAMONDBNK, as well as ensuring that no party, however and wherever placed, threatens the survival of Diamond Bank and the integrity of the Nigerian financial system. It is my hope that all concerned remain faithful to the objective requirements and fiduciary obligations of their positions of stewardship.


I speak on behalf of myself as chairman of DIAMONDBNK and 3 other non-executive directors (NEDs) of the Bank namely Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, Mrs Juliet Anammah and Mrs Aisha Oyebode. As individuals and as a group of professionals with direct knowledge of the events captured below, I state emphatically our dissociation from any dangerous abuses of office highlighted below, and insist that proper governance be maintained in this, and all other cases. I assume that the CBN did not have all the facts prior to now; if so, it is my assessment that it is not too late for the CBN to do the correct thing by insisting on the Board oversight of the underlying matters, as referenced in our prayer in this letter.


We are all technically independent directors of DIAMONDBNKas we do not represent the interest of any specific shareholder but the interest of all the stakeholders especially those whose investments have made Diamond Bank what it is today as a systemically important bank in Nigeria.


As Independent non-executive directors, we are all very concerned and motivated particularly by concerns of a bank that now appears to be adrift with no direction and leadership, exacerbated by misinformation and counter information within the media. The most recent being the assertions in the media on Monday November 12, 2018 that the bank is to be acquired by Access Bank only for that to be denied by Access Bank, which has now totally dissociated itself from any such transaction. AlsoDIAMONDBNKhas also dissociated itself from the assertions in the media. I have elected to ignore comments from various quarters that the Access Bank transaction is favored by the CEO, and the very loud boasts by the CEO himself that the Access Bank transaction has been endorsed by our regulator, to the exclusion of all other options being considered by the board; as I have also chosen not to speculate on the incentives and motivation for his haste and the evident abuse that will be perpetuated if any such deal is allowed to go through without following due process.



1.  Our Position

DIAMONDBNK’s performance has continued to decline. Current forecasts indicate the bank will close 2018 on significantly lower profit (or even a loss situation) than planned. Management was not able to attend the Q3 Analysts call and we are aware that S&P has downgraded the bank’s credit rating. The bank had neither declared nor paid any dividend since 2013 and the Bank was only meeting the CBN Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) by the grace of CBN forbearance and the current financial position of the Bank does not show any signs of improvement.


The Bank is in dire need of recapitalization. Nonetheless, the Board remains the foremost governing body of the bank with the fiduciary responsibility to protect the interests of all shareholders, thus, all recapitalization proposals including potential acquisitions can only be by a full Board for consideration and approval.


The Diamond Bank Board has 5 “independent” NEDs and the action of the CEO in now attempting to remove 4 of these 5 NEDs, after the fact, was prejudiced and selectively done to undermine the independence of the NEDs. The insertions and “acceptance” of their purported resignation, contrary to the decision of the full board in a meeting, to rescind the decision, was in bad faith and is ultra vires and of no consequence and effect. This attitude of the CEO in fact aligns with the CBN examiners’ observation referenced in paragraph 3 below regarding corporate governance where the management takes actions either without notifying the Board or without securing Board approval as has been seen even in matters concerning the investment vehicle of the CEO’s family.


Further, according to CAMA and SEC Rules, only the Board can accept/approve the resignation of a director. Thus, an acceptance by an executive such as the CEO being null and void and illegal suggests that an acceptance by the CBN based on this illegal action by the CEO appears to have been done hastily.


Indeed, the said resignation of the 4 NEDs never came into effect in law and the Bank through its Board at the meeting of October 22 2018 continued to hold them out as Directors with no dissent from any director. The 4 NEDs remain on the board of Diamond Bank unless and until they have tendered their valid letters of resignations and the Board has accepted same.



2. Background and Context

Following several directors reaching their expiration of tenor in 2016/2017, the board decided in alliance with international best practice to have a more professional and independent membership, and, therefore, brought in additional professionals to help steer the Bank. These board members are myself, Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, Mrs Juliet Anammah, Mr. Dele Babade, Mr Idris Mohammed, Mr. Chris Ubosi and Mrs Aisha Oyebode. And the board recently recommended Mr. Oghogho Akpata to the board awaiting confirmation from the CBN


The board identified the need to inject equity into the bank. In addition, the bank had several financial obligations due in 2019, which the board insisted the funding should be in place by end 2018 (before the Nigerian elections). To improve the viability of the bank, the board had approved the sale of its subsidiaries outside Nigeria as this would be expecting to lead to, subject to the CBN approval, a reduction in the minimum CAR from 15% to 10% upon conversion of the bank to a National Bank (from International Bank).


The board then discussed the options for raising capital and one of the key shareholders indicated interest in injecting more equity into the bank but on condition of a change in management. Observing the issues of performance, the board then decided to first determine the capital requirement by appointing advisers to review the loan book. The result of this evaluation was expected at the end of October 2018 and we presume this has been received by the bank


The Central Bank examiners, in August 2018, had highlighted potential gaps in corporate governance based on transactions which, from their assessment, executive management had not disclosed to the board as it ought to have. Specifically, the examiners highlighted the new corporate head office which was under construction and observed that the progress in terms of cost and status of progress was not captured in any board minutes and indeed was not discussed nor was any budget approval for cost increase discussed or presented to the board.


With the examiners’ concerns, new capital being contemplated and declining performance of the bank in the past 4 years, the Non-executive directors (NEDs) critically assessed the quality of executive leadership of the Bank and the need to strengthen the leadership. A key shareholder CSSAF DBN Holdings demanded an immediate removal of management principally the CEO but the Board favored a less drastic approach to minimize disruption and also enable the Board secure new leadership.


After several discussions, the CEO, of the Bank who is also a representative of the second largest shareholder Kunoch Ltd agreed to resign effective January 3, 2019 but would not tender his letter to confirm his verbal notification. In response, the representative of CSSAF DBN Holdings therefore at the Board meeting held on October 18, 2018 put forward a motion for the removal of the CEO with immediate effect. This was despite continuous negotiations and attempts by members of the Board, to provide an amicable solution to this impending shareholder fight and reaching several tentative agreements, which were frustrated by both parties. Nonetheless due to technical reasons and reluctance of board members regarding an immediate removal of the CEO, the vote for the removal of the CEO was postponed, pending legal clarifications, which could not be provided by the Company Secretary.


The CEO, at the October 18 2018 meeting, had a financial adviser appointed by the executive management without reference to the board to present to the board various strategic options for recapitalization either through an internal rights issue or possible merger with other Tier 1 banks. While the board stated that this was to have been presented to the board capital raising committee, it allowed the presentation to be made. The presentation, though based on 2017 financials was still very high level and, was well received by the Board and the board directed that the recommendation be passed on to the capital raising committee of the bank to evaluate this along with all other options being considered – new injection of capital by the shareholders, merger with a local bank or position to partner with an international bank not currently operating in Nigeria


On Friday October 19, 2018, due to the lack of clarity on the motion for immediate removal of the CEO, the representative of CSSAF DBN Holdings informed board members that as a majority shareholder CSSAF DBN Holdings would call for an Extraordinary General Meeting to remove the CEO since the board had not voted on the matter. The 4 NEDs then decided that it was becoming a shareholder fight, which they felt could have been averted either by the CEO tendering a letter indicating his resignation effective January 3, 2019 or by CSSAF DBN Holdings accepting to give the Board the responsibility of ensuring the issue is resolved amicably. Purely on this basis, the 4 NEDs wrote to resign their appointments immediately by emails to the Company Secretary to allow the 2 shareholders resolve the impasse


The action of the 4 NEDs had the desired purpose of forcing the key shareholders, with the intervention of the CBN, to resolve the impasse. The CEO eventually wrote the letter indicating he would resign from the bank effective January 3, 2019. This letter was written on Diamond bank corporate letter head, addressed to the CBN Governor and forwarded to the Bank Chairman (who had purportedly resigned.). With the letter and the substantive matter seemingly resolved, the 4 NEDs, after tremendous pressure by all parties concerned to rescind their resignation including the representatives of CSSAF DBN Holdings, Kunoch Limited and the CEO himself, on Sunday October 21 2018 sent emails to the Company Secretary notifying her of their decision to rescind their resignation given that the impasse had been resolved.


Another positive and significant outcome was the delivery, by the majority shareholder, of its intent to inject further capital into the bank since their condition that the CEO be removed had been met (by his resignation notice)


The CEO then called for an emergency board meeting on Monday October 22, 2018 to request a mandate for the CEO and executive management to review and conclude on a potential strategic merger as an option for recapitalization. The company secretary sent formal notices to all the 13 board members and all 13 board members (including the 4 NEDs who had previously and purportedly resigned and rescinded their resignation) were on the call. It was most disturbing when the CEO, who was on his way out, vigorously sought exclusive powers to negotiate and conclude the terms for the alleged acquisition of Diamond Bank by Access Bank, a development that had never been tabled before the Board, and which(if and whenever received) like other expressions of interest, should be subjected to objective evaluation by the Board and its Advisers. This sought mandate was not given to the CEO for the reasons stated above.


The CEO’s resignation letter was also discussed and the CEO stated his preference thatthe letter be regarded as a private letter and excluded from board minutes.


The Chairman stated that given the implications of its content for the bank which had been discussed by the Board, it had to be included in Board minutes. Immediately after the meeting the Chairman sought the legal advice of the Company secretary who confirmed that given the NSE listing rules, the letter was material and the NSE should be formally notified. The Chairman then asked the Company Secretary and the Chairman of the Board Governance and Personnel Committee to review the Rules, following which the Company Secretary was to proceed in compliance them. The further action of the CEO on October 24th truncated this process and as of writing, the minutes of the October 22nd meeting have not been circulated and it is not certain if the bank has formally notified the NSE of the CEO’s impending resignation on January 3rd 2019.


The strategic option was again referred to the Capital-Raising Committee, which met immediately after the board call; the committee is made of 4 NEDs and 3 Executive Directors (including the CEO).


The Capital-Raising Committee agreed to consider 5 Advisers. It was further agreed that the Terms of Reference would be drafted by one of the members and the Advisers were to be contacted within 48 hours of the meeting.


It came as a total surprise to all the NEDs of the bank to read in the media on October 24th that 4 NEDs had resigned to create room for a potential investor planning to invest in the bank. This was patently untrue. These deceptive and invalid media stories have amplified in volume and tone, with the latest being a convenient and self-serving story in the November 12th, 2018 edition of The Nation newspaper, wherein the position long canvassed by the outgoing CEO was portrayed as the position of the Board and Bank.


For emphasis, the Board has never received any expression of interest by Access Bank for any form of merger or acquisition involving both Diamond Bank and Access Bank. If and when that is received, our principled position remains that the criteria must be defined by the Board; all valid and competent interests objectively assessed, and a determination made in the transparent and fiduciary cause of protecting and preserving the legitimate interests of the shareholders, depositors, staff, and other stakeholders of the bank.


Further to this media article, on October 25th the CEO further sent letters to the 4 NEDs purporting to accept their resignation. The Company Secretary also posted a notification of the resignation of the 4 NEDs on the NSE issuers’ portal and finally the CEO sent a letter from the CBN which was addressed to him and in which the CBN accepted the resignation of the 4 NEDs and instructed the CEO to find replacements.


Since then there have been media reports with varying renditions of the facts.


This letter has been necessitated by the following:

  1. The seeming lack of regulatory / procedural clarity regarding the purported resignation of four directors to which it is important that the three regulators; CBN, SEC and NSE jointly or severally make a pronouncement directly to the bank on these matters having now been apprised of the facts in the foregoing and other consultation they may have had.
  2. The need to maintain corporate governance in the bank and protect the interest of all the shareholders of the bank. 


Our Prayers

  1. That all regulatory bodies copied in this letter objectively review the foregoing and address this matter promptly in a manner that restores confidence not only in Diamond bank as an entity but in the financial system as a whole.
  2. That the said regulatory bodies continue to support the Board of Diamond Bank in discharging its fiduciary responsibility in protecting the interests of all shareholders and stakeholders.
  3. That the Board be allowed to convene the Board strategic meeting as planned for Q4 2018 to discuss the above matters and decide the way forward.


We trust that at this particularly crucial time, the Central Bank of Nigeria and indeed all the regulatory bodies copied in this letter will take necessary steps to prevent the manifest erosion of corporate governance in any bank, as this could very easily have negative and far reaching systemic effects.


Yours Sincerely,






·         President, Nigerian Stock Exchange

·         Director General,Securities and Exchange Commission

·         Chairman, CSSAF DB Holdings

·         Chairman, Kunoch Limited

·         Chairman, African Capital Alliance



You can react to this publication by sending an e-mail to info@proshareng.com



Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd.



Stock Price Performance As at Friday, December 07, 2018

The share price of DIAMONDBNK  moved up by +56.92% in one week. However,DIAMONDBNK has lost -15.7% in one(1) month, -37.04% in six(6) months, -32.89% in one(1) year and -32% YTD. 


Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd.

Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd. 



Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd. 



Related News

1.               Fitch Downgrades Diamond Bank to 'CCC'

2.                Diamond Bank Receives CBN Approval To Operate As A National Bank

3.                DIAMONDBNK, PRESTIGE and FCMB Lead Top Losers Table Week To Date

4.                DIAMONDBNK Has Lost N12.74bn in Market CAP, 39.01 per cent Month To Date

5.                Diamond Bank Plc - Overblown Fright Or Justified Concerns?

6.                Diamond Bank Trades 59% of Total Market Volume; Hits 208.68m, Highest in 10 Months

7.                Diamond Bank Losses N5.33b In Market CAP in Two Days - ACCESS Grows 1.95%; DIAMOND Losses -17.97%

8.               Access Bank and Diamond Bank Issue Denials on M and A

9.                Why Diamond Bank Opted For A CBN-Managed Acquisition By Access Bank Over The Carlyle Group

10.            Diamond Bank Plc IR Page on Proshare MARKETS

11.              Nigerian Diamond Bank Downgraded On Weaker-Than-Expected Asset Quality; Outlook Negative

12.             Diamond Bank Plc Postpones 9M 2018 Conference Call Due to Unforeseen Circumstances

13.             DIAMONDBNK Declares N1.65bn PAT in Q3 2018 Result,(SP:N1.44k)

14.             Diamond Bank Plc 9M 2018 - Underlying Pressures Persist

15.             Diamond Bank Plc Refutes Recent Speculations On Capital Injection

16.             Diamond Bank Plc Announces The Resignation of Board Chairman and Three Non-Executive Directors

17.             Diamond Bank Issues Notice on CBN Levy on London Stock Exchange – Sep 07, 2018

18.            CBN Debits Diamond Bank’s Accounts for the Full Amount of the Fine Levied Against It

19.             One Week After CBN Fines –MTN Share Price Drops by 31.06%; DIAMONDBNK and STANBIC Also Drop



Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd.

Proshare Nigeria Pvt. Ltd.

Related News