Business Regulations, Law & Practice | |
Business Regulations, Law & Practice | |
10961 VIEWS | |
![]() |
Wednesday, 24 October
2018 16:44PM / Oserogho & Associates
Introduction, Objectives
and Commencement
The Federal Inland Revenue
Service (“FIRS”) with the approval of the Federal Minister of Finance, have
published the gazetted version of the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations
2018 (“TP Regulations 2018”).
Also published by FIRS are
the Guidelines on Transfer Pricing Regulations and a Public Notice on amongst
other things, the set date for the enforcement of the TP Regulations 2018
Administrative Penalties for non-compliance with the TP Regulations 2018.
The TP Regulations 2018 has
therefore now replaced the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2012. One
of the key objectives of the TP Regulations 2018 is to provide a legal
framework for the implementation of Transfer Pricing Regulations. This key objective
is expected to ultimately reduce tax evasion; and tax evasion commonly occurs
through the under-pricing or the over-pricing of transactions between related
or connected parties who infringe the arm’s length principle when undertaking
their transactions
Other key objectives of the
TP Regulations 2018 include the reduction of double taxation and the provision
of a level playing field for both national and multi-national enterprises.
The commencement date for the
TP Regulations 2018 is retrospectively 12th March 2018; though FIRS has by a
October 2018 Public Notice extended the compliance commencement start date for
the administrative penalties for non-compliance with the TP Regulations 2018 to
now be 31st December 2018.
Arm’s Length Principle
The TP Regulations 2018
treats a company’s Head or parent office as a separate and connected entity to
its subsidiary Permanent Establishment office or entity (“PE”), with regard to
any commercial transaction undertaken between the parent/head office and its subsidiary
office, being treated as controlled transactions that must comply with the TP
Regulations 2018.
Persons are also deemed
connected where one of them has the ability to control or influence another or
other connected persons in making financial, commercial or operational
decisions.
The Arm’s Length Tax
Principle simply requires that the conditions of a controlled transaction,
between connected persons, whether resident or non-resident, must not differ
from the conditions that would have applied where the connected persons are
separate, independent and neutral parties, undertaking comparable transactions
under comparable circumstances.
Where connected persons fail
to adhere to the Arm’s Length Principle in their transactions, FIRS is
permitted to make necessary tax adjustments to ensure that the appropriate
taxable profits from the connected transactions are collected,
Transfer Pricing Methods
In determining whether a
transaction or a series of transactions are consistent with the arm’s length
principle, one of the following Transfer Pricing methods will be applied:-
The preferred TP method to be
adopted will depend on various factors including the strength or weakness of
such a TP method considered; the appropriateness of such a method; the
availability of reliable TP data or information and the degree of comparability
between the controlled transaction and uncontrolled transactions.
Advance Pricing Agreements
A connected person can, as an
efficient tax strategic plan, approach FIRS to execute a Advance Pricing
Agreement (“APA”) which Agreement will provide some set criteria and certainty
for determining the connected person’s future transfer pricing compliance
obligations. The duration of a first APA must not however exceed three (3)
years.
All APAs must adhere to the
provisions of the TP Regulations 2018.
Mandatory TP Declaration
All connected persons are now
required to, within six (6) months of the end of their accounting year, declare
any relationship that they might have with any other person or persons, whether
or not the connected persons are resident or non-resident.
Failure to file a TP
Declaration within the timeframe required attracts an Administrative penalty of
Ten Million Naira (N10,000,000). A further administrative penalty of N10,000
(Ten Thousand Naira) for every day that the filing default occurs, will also be
applied.
Failure to file TP
Declarations for occurrences like mergers, acquisitions, sale or such other
corporate structural changes attracts an administrative penalty of N25,000
(Twenty-Five Thousand Naira) for each day that such filing default persists.
Mandatory TP Disclosures
Connected persons are also
now required to, with or without notice from FIRS, file Disclosures of all
their controlled transactions not later than six (6) months after the end of
each of their accounting year or eighteen (18) months after their incorporation,
whichever of the latter two is earlier.
The administrative penalty
for failing to file a Mandatory Disclosure with FIRS or for filing such
disclosure with inaccurate information is the higher of either Ten Million
Naira (N10,000,000) or One per cent (1%) of the value of the controlled
transaction that was not disclosed; or where disclosed, was incorrectly
disclosed. A further administrative penalty of Ten Thousand Naira (N10,000) for
everyday that these breaches persist will also be applied.
Mandatory TP Documentation
Connected persons are also
now required to keep a record of sufficient data or information, with an
analysis of such retained data and information, which verifies the pricing of
connected transactions as being consistent with the arm’s length principle.
This requirement also applies where the connected person undertakes a
transaction through a related party with a third person.
All transaction data and
records relating to any trade carried on between connected persons are required
to be preserved and retained for a period of six (6) years from the date on
which any filing return relevant to the last transaction entry was required to
be made.
The same administrative
penalties that apply to defaults in filing Declarations and Disclosures also
apply to failures to file the required Transfer Pricing Documentation with
FIRS.
Where FIRS request for any TP
information and such information, including contemporaneous documentation, are
not furnished within the time specified in any FIRS Notice, with no extension
of time granted subsequently, additional administrative penalties will apply.
The first administrative penalty is a sum equal to one per cent (1%) of the
value of the controlled transaction to which such information relates. The
second administrative penalty is the sum of Ten Thousand Naira (N10,000) for
each day that the default persists.
General TP Guidelines
By an Information Circular
dated 20th September 2018, FIRS published its Guidelines regarding TP
Documentation. A key provision in this Guideline is the advice to Taxpayers not
to engage or procure the services of any person who is currently employed by,
or who was formerly employed by FIRS to develop, record, correct or submit any
TP Documentation on the Tax Payers behalf. This is especially as the latter
constitute a conflict of interest malpractice.
Connected Persons are also
required to prepare and submit to FIRS their annual Country-by-Country reports
not later than twelve (12) months after the end of the connected person’s end
of accounting year.
Another new provision in
these Guidelines and in the TP Regulations 2018 is FIRS undertaking to keep
confidential all information and records disclosed in all TP Documentation
filings.
TP Dispute Resolution
FIRS is required by the TP
Regulations 2018 to establish a Decision Review Panel (“TP Review Panel”) to
administratively resolve any dispute or controversy that arises from the
application of any of the provisions of the TP Regulations 2018.
Any objection to a TP tax
assessment is required to be filed within thirty (30) days of the taxpayer’s
receipt of such a tax assessment. The decision of the TP Review Panel is deemed
to represent the final decision of FIRS without encumbering the taxpayer’s
right to further appeal against such a decision to a judicial body.
Conclusion
It will be very interesting
to review some data on the efficacy of the old Income Tax (Transfer Pricing)
Regulations 2012. Lessons learned from such data will be very helpful in the
implementation of the TP Regulations 2018.
Generally, the lack of
reliable and verifiable transactional data, with their efficient analysis
remains a handicap to an effective tax administration, which includes Transfer
Pricing Arm’s Length Comparability Transactions.
Application of reciprocal
International Tax Treaties on Transfer Pricing application will only yield the
desired results if adequate manpower capacity and funding to aid tax
enforcement machinery are made available.
The neutrality and
independence of the TP Review Panel, under a very aggressive tax regime, is
doubtful if the Review Panel does not adopt Mediation methods, as opposed to
the traditional more aggressive adversarial hostile methods, in resolving tax
disputes.
Disclaimer
This is a free
educational material. It does not serve as a source of solicitation,
advertisement or the offering of legal services or advice of any kind. No
Client/Attorney relationship is therefore created. Readers are strongly
advised to always seek from qualified Legal Practitioners, competent legal
counseling to their specific factual situation.
Intellectual
Property Protected!
This material
is protected by International Intellectual Property Laws and Regulations. This
material can therefore only be reproduced or re-distributed for
non-profit educational purposes under the strict condition that our Authorship
of this material is explicitly acknowledged, and our above Disclaimer Notice is
prominently displayed.
LATEST Developments in the Market
1.
FIRS
issues Public notice on Implementation of the Revised 2018 Transfer Pricing
Regulations Oct 22, 2018
2.
Senate
Passes Resolution Mandating CBN To Suspend Bank ATM Charges
3.
NASSBER
Bills – A Status Update On Market Related Legislation
4.
Stakeholders
explore the Role of IST in Nigerian Capital Market Dispute Resolution
5.
Regulatory
Conversations – A Public-Private Dialogue Holds On Sept 18, 2018
6.
Buhari
Signs Law Separating NFIU from EFCC
7.
Unconstitutional,
Null And Void - Legal Opinion On Preservation Of Suspicious Assets Order
8. The
Draft Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance 2018 For Your Input
9.
2018
Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance: Sectorial Codes to Serve as Guidelines -
FRC
10. Landmark
FHC Judgment On The Information Rights of Investors In The Nigerian Capital
Market
11. Executive
Summary of Changes to CAMA
12. Senate
Passes New CAMA Bill into Law; Lists Seven Benefits
13. Finance
and Accounting Outsourcing
14. Judgment
Delivered Against Plaintiff In First Nigerian Case on ATM Dispense Error
15. Communique
of the 58th Annual General Conference of the NBA
16. IFRS
Reporting – Matters Arising On Derivatives
17. Corporate
Governance As A Strategy For Investment Drive – August 2018
18. Nigerian
Patient’s Bill of Rights: 5 Things to Note
19. IFRS 15 Implementation Efforts of 2018 Interim Reporters in the Oil and Gas Industry
NB: This Legal Alert is a free educational material, for your general information and enlightenment ONLY. This Alert, by itself, does not create a Client/Attorney relationship. Recipients are therefore advised to seek professional legal counselling to their specific situations when they do arise. Questions, comments, criticisms, suggestions, new ideas, contributions, etc are always welcomed. This Legal Alert is protected by Intellectual Property Law and Regulations and is reproduced by Proshare Nigeria Limited under permission, for the Proshare online investment community, from Oserogho & Associates [ contactus@oseroghoassociates.com ]
Related
Legal Alerts
1.
ADR
- Alternate Dispute Resolution Multi-Door Court House – Legal Alert
2.
Copyright
Collective Societies'' Regulations Revisited - Legal Alert
4.
Sales
Tax versus VAT: Supremacy - Case Law Review
5.
Fire
Safety Compliances and Regulations
6.
Admissibility
Of Evidence As It Relates To Electronic Devises, Social Media And Forensic
Science
7.
New
Requirements For Registration Of Charges (Form CAC8) Takes Effect April 3, 2018
8. Court
Approves Website Seizure and Anton Piller Order Against Online Copyright Piracy
Platform
9.
Hotels
and Restaurants Consumption (Fiscalisation) Regulations
10. Court
Grants Injunction Restraining Lagos State From Enforcing New Consumption Tax
Law
12. Police
Powers of Arrest and Civil Contracts
13. Stakeholders
harp on robust PPP, at 2017 BusinessDay Education Summit
16. Stamp
Duties on Bank Deposits and Transfers: Are There Unresolved Issues?
17. IFRS
9 Standard Implementation: Building Organisational Capacity for Implementation
Success
18. Bank
Charges: Role, Responsibilities and Rights
19. Bank
Charges & Recent Regulatory Guidelines
20. Legal
Update On The Implementation Of The Stamp Duties Act And The Rights Of Bank
Customers
21. How
Recent Environmental, Waste and Effluent Law & Regulations Affect You
22. Indonesia
Issues New Regulation Regarding PLCs' Shareholding Reporting Obligations
23. Contracts
- Time Is Of The Essence
24. Nigeria's
new Immigration Regulations 2017
25. The
Law, The Environment And Permissible Noise Levels
26. Advancing
the Role and Effectiveness of Audit Committees
27. House
Passes Federal Competition Commission Bill
28. Registering
a Business in Nigeria: Preliminary Considerations
29. PEBEC
approves 60-day action plan on Doing Business in Nigeria
30. Annual
Minimum Corporate Compliances
31. You've
Registered Your Trademark, What Now? Tips on Maintaining Trademark Protection
32. Why
FGs Ban of Vehicle Imports Through Land Borders Makes Sense
33. While
Nigeria Dithers, 3 in 4 African Countries Improve Business Environment