Proshare Logo
   Market Date: 29-01-2015   
Agriculture ARTS FINANCE All One Min News Archives Bonds Cap Mkt Sentiments Capital Market CASHLESS NIGERIA Commodities Corporate Earnings Daily & Weekly Market Updates Elections Enterpreneurship ETFs Forex Frauds & Scandals General Global Market Insurance Investors NewsBeat Islamic Finance Mergers & Aquisitions Money Market Mortgage Mutual Funds Nigeria Economy Oil Sector Opinions and Analysis Pensions People Personal Finance Politics Power Products & Services Professionals Property Public Offers Private Placements Regulators REITs Stock PICKS Taxation Telcos Travel & Tours Unlisted OTC MARKET World of Business

N5.6b loan: Court adjourns AP, Access Bank suit

Category: General

  Read (1125)
N5.6b loan: Court adjourns AP, Access Bank suit


A PLEA by the counsel to Access Bank Plc for more time to study the objections raised by the African Petroleum (AP) Plc yesterday stalled... hearing in the N5.6 billion dispute involving the two organisations.

Justice Ibrahim Auta of the Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos, adjourned the suit till Monday.

At yesterday’s hearing, the respondent’s lawyer, Sunday Ajibade (SAN), told the court that his client - AP- was served with a copy of the petition on Monday, adding that he had filed a preliminary objection and counter-affidavit to the petition.

His words: “Based on the development, we are ready to proceed with the hearing since the court originally fixed yesterday for continuation of trial.”

However, counsel to the petitioner, Norrison Quakers, urged the court to order parties to file written addresses before the hearing of the petition.

Quakers noted that the civil procedure rules of the Federal High Court stipulate that written addresses must be filed in support or opposition to the petition, urging the court to adjourn the matter for parties to comply with the rules of the court.

Responding, Ajibade insisted that a written address was unnecessary in the case because the application was filed under the Company’s Winding Up Law, maintaining that if the court should grant any adjournment, it should be a short one.

Ajibade said: “This petition has been advertised and is causing a lot of inconveniencies on my client. So, if the court is minded of granting an adjournment, it should be a short one.”

Justice Auta, while ruling on the argument, said that written addresses are only meant to aid the court and not for counsel. He then ordered the lawyers to proceed with the adoption of their applications.

Sensing that the court was prepared to go on with the case, Quakers informed the court that he was only served a copy of the counter affidavit and as stipulated by law, he was entitled to 48 hours to study and make up his mind on what to do on the objection.

He, therefore, urged the court to grant him an adjournment to enable him study the objections.

The judge consequently fixed July 27 for hearing of the petition and ordered that the written addresses should not be filed.

According to the matter, the bank averred that on December 17, 2007, it granted a N100 million facility in form of a Trade Finance Line (TFC) to AP.

The facility, according to Access Bank, was for a tenor of one year, with each transaction within the facility to have a specified tenor to a maximum of 90 days.

It added that in consideration of the TFC, AP gave a negative pledge in its favour, adding that AP later utilised the TFC by requesting a letter of credit of $35, 153. 822.15 to be opened by the Access Bank on its behalf.

The bank, however, contended that upon maturity of the facility, AP was unable to settle the obligation of $35, 153. 822.15, and that since the obligation became due, it made several attempts to get AP to settle its obligation, all to no avail.

It further told the court that the respondent was insolvent and unable to pay its debt, urging the court to wind it up.

In its opposition to the petition, AP contended that the only reason why it failed to pay the debt was because the bank insisted on being paid an amount in excess of what it was legitimately entitled and its desire to obtain an undue and illegitimate advantage arising from fluctuations in the exchange rate.

Besides, AP argued that the petitioner lacks the locus standi to institute the case against it, and that the subject matter constitutes an abuse of court process.

(Source:Nigerian Compass)

Tags: , 

Comment With Your Facebook or Yahoo! ID

Latest news

News on General

About Us

Who We Are
Our Team & Partners
Corporate Governance
Advertise with Us
Subscribe / Unsubscribe
Site Map
News Feed - RSS
Contact Us
Volunteer Program
Message from CEO

News & Features
The Analyst / Market Data
Investor Relations Portal
The Regulator
Economy & Politics
Training Portal
Events Calendar
NewsStands - Online Reputation

Products and Services

Research & Market Intelligence
Analyst Services
Offers & Rights Support Service
Investor Relations Services
Alert & Subscription Services
Share Support Services
Proshare Consult
Event & Seminar Coverage
Market Directory
File a Complaint
News & Analysis

News from TheANALYST
Video News from WebTV
Money Market Updates
Opinions & Analysis
Nigerian Economy
Market Data
The Regulator
Discussion Forum

Subscriber Agreement
Privacy Policy
Data Policy
Copyright Policy
Comments in Site
Advertising Code
Conflict of Interest
Content Partnership
3rd Parties

Online Trading and Execution
Legal Support Services
Web/Technology Services
File a Complaint

CBN Governor 2014