Proshare Logo
   Market Date: 24-10-2014   
Agriculture All One Min News Archives Bonds Cap Mkt Sentiments Capital Market CASHLESS NIGERIA Commodities Corporate Earnings Daily & Weekly Market Updates Enterpreneurship ETFs Forex Frauds & Scandals General Global Market Insurance Investors NewsBeat Islamic Finance Mergers & Aquisitions Money Market Mortgage Mutual Funds Nigeria Economy Oil Sector Opinions and Analysis Pensions People Personal Finance Politics Power Products & Services Professionals Property Public Offers Private Placements Regulators REITs Stock PICKS Taxation Telcos Travel & Tours Unlisted OTC MARKET World of Business

Court dismisses Lagosâ€â„Â

Category: Investors NewsBeat


  Read (7503)
Court dismisses Lagosâ€â„Â


An Ikeja High Court has dismissed a suit by the Lagos State Board of Internal Revenue against Nigerian Bottling Company for lack of merit.



In his judgment delivered on June 18, on Justice Hakeem Oshodi held that the request by the LSBIR for payment of sales tax and value Added Tax was tantamount to to double taxation.



A true copy of the judgment was made available to our correspondent in Lagos on Wednesday.



The LSBIR had gone to court, claiming N210m from the NBC as sales tax arrears and interest, at the rate of 21 per cent between June 1 2001 and the time of a judgment. The claimant also joined the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, as co-defendants to the suit.



In its statement of claim through by the Board’s Assistant Director, Mr. Fatai Abbas, the LSBIR claimed that the NBC was obliged under the Sales Tax Law to collect sales tax from the consumers of its products and remit same to the claimant.



But the NBC had in its statement of defence by its Area Finance Manager, Mr. Idowu Akinwande, said prior to the imposition of N243, 075, 000m as sales tax and penalty, the claimant never requested NBC to produce for examination its record books, receipt, and accounts in respect of sales of its products.



It added that based on the above, the estimated amount contained in the Notice of Assessment dated July 12, 2001 was unconscionable, arbitrary and did not represent its correct sales.



According to the NBC, Sales tax and VAT tax were the same and imposition of both taxes on the company amounted to double taxation.



The judge said, “As a rule tax statutes are interpreted very strictly; there is no common law of taxation, hence no general principle of law can displace the true meaning and effects of a tax statute which has been validly passed. For tax liability to arise, there must be a clear linkage between the charging provisions and the intended tax payer. This link must be direct, not inferential.’’



(Source:Punch)



Tags: , 



Comment With Your Facebook or Yahoo! ID


Latest news


News on Investors NewsBeat

About Us

Who We Are
Our Team & Partners
Corporate Governance
Advertise with Us
Subscribe / Unsubscribe
Site Map
News Feed - RSS
Newsletter
Contact Us
Volunteer Program
Message from CEO
Resources

News & Features
The Analyst / Market Data
Investor Relations Portal
The Regulator
Economy & Politics
WebTV
Training Portal
Events Calendar
NewsStands - Online Reputation

Products and Services

Research & Market Intelligence
Analyst Services
Offers & Rights Support Service
Investor Relations Services
Alert & Subscription Services
Share Support Services
Proshare Consult
Event & Seminar Coverage
Market Directory
File a Complaint
News & Analysis

#1minNews
News from TheANALYST
Video News from WebTV
Money Market Updates
Opinions & Analysis
Nigerian Economy
Market Data
The Regulator
Newsletters
Discussion Forum
Policy

Subscriber Agreement
Privacy Policy
Data Policy
Disclaimer
Copyright Policy
Trademarks
Comments in Site
Advertising Code
Conflict of Interest
Content Partnership
3rd Parties

Online Trading and Execution
Training
Legal Support Services
Web/Technology Services
File a Complaint