Proshare Logo
   Market Date: 28-01-2015   
Agriculture ARTS FINANCE All One Min News Archives Bonds Cap Mkt Sentiments Capital Market CASHLESS NIGERIA Commodities Corporate Earnings Daily & Weekly Market Updates Elections Enterpreneurship ETFs Forex Frauds & Scandals General Global Market Insurance Investors NewsBeat Islamic Finance Mergers & Aquisitions Money Market Mortgage Mutual Funds Nigeria Economy Oil Sector Opinions and Analysis Pensions People Personal Finance Politics Power Products & Services Professionals Property Public Offers Private Placements Regulators REITs Stock PICKS Taxation Telcos Travel & Tours Unlisted OTC MARKET World of Business

FG paid N1.7tn fuel subsidy, not N1.4tn – CBN

Category: Oil Sector

  Read (1775)
FG paid N1.7tn fuel subsidy, not N1.4tn – CBN


The Central Bank of Nigeria on Tuesday put the “actual” total subsidy payments on fuel imports in 2011 at N1.7tn, an excess of N300bn above the N1.4tn figure given by the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, last week.
The apex bank told the House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee on Subsidy Regime that that was the amount it had paid up to December 2011.
“As the banker to the government, I can confirm that N1.736tn was paid out as subsidy up to December 2011. These figures are the actuals as of December 2011,” CBN’s Deputy Governor, Mr. Kingsley Moghalu, who represented the apex bank’s governor, Mr. Lamido Sanusi, at the subsidy probe told the House Committee.
Okonjo-Iweala, while testifying before the same committee last week, said that following the reconciliation of payments up to December 2011, the total payments on subsidy now stood at N1.4tn.
She claimed that the earlier widely quoted figure of N1.3tn represented calculations up to October 2011.
The minister added that with total payments reconciled, the authentic figure in the books of the Ministry of Finance was N1.4tn.
Apparently shocked by the latest conflicting figure, Chairman of the committee, Mr. Farouk Lawan, said, “It appears like the figure on the payments for fuel subsidy will continue to go up. It appears the end will not come soon.”
According to him, a major concern to the apex bank is the pressure the rising subsidy costs put on the foreign exchange market.
Moghalu informed the committee that the CBN, as an economic adviser to government, was “worried” over the steady rise in fuel subsidy payments since 2009.
He disclosed that the demand for subsidy payments rose by 670 per cent between 2009 and 2010.
Moghalu stated that by 2011, the demand jumped 17 times, representing a 1, 523 per cent increase in payments.
“The disbursement of very large sums for the oil sector payments puts pressure on the foreign exchange market.
“The multiplicity in the beneficiaries of subsidy payments was the main factor that put pressure on the foreign exchange market.”
The deputy governor told the committee that a total of $39bn was sold in 2009 alone due to pressure for payment of subsidy claims.
He stated that the credit in the Petroleum Support Fund Account, as at January this year, was N673.8bn but noted that the account had been drawn by N667.5bn by January 17, leaving a balance of N6.2bn.
Moghalu also gave figures on the Domestic Excess Crude Account, which he said had a credit of N2.56tn in January.
However, he said that as of January 17, the account had been drawn by N2.54tn, leaving a balance of N19.2bn.
He told the committee that the pressure on the market forced the CBN to initiate an audit of the foreign exchange deposits in August 2011 to “determine the veracity of the prevailing demand for foreign exchange, especially at the official window of the foreign exchange market.”
He said the result of the audit showed that the pressure came from the oil sector.
Moghalu absolved the CBN of any role in the award of contracts for fuel importation. He said the apex bank did not also know anything about the deductions at source by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation from domestic crude proceeds to pay for fuel subsidy.
The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria also made presentations to the committee, giving government conditions that must be met before removing subsidy.
The NLC, which was represented by its Chief Economist, Mr. Peter Ozon-Eso, called for the revival of domestic refineries and to “create the environment for the establishment of new ones.”
“We want a system that is less dependent on imports and can create employment locally”, he said.
On his part, the President of the TUC, Mr. Peter Esele, urged the PPPRA to “eliminate the round-tripping of imported products.
“Government should legislate that subsidy should be paid only on products delivered to retail outlets; thus consumed in Nigeria.”
Source : Punch

Tags: , 

Comment With Your Facebook or Yahoo! ID

Latest news

News on Oil Sector

About Us

Who We Are
Our Team & Partners
Corporate Governance
Advertise with Us
Subscribe / Unsubscribe
Site Map
News Feed - RSS
Contact Us
Volunteer Program
Message from CEO

News & Features
The Analyst / Market Data
Investor Relations Portal
The Regulator
Economy & Politics
Training Portal
Events Calendar
NewsStands - Online Reputation

Products and Services

Research & Market Intelligence
Analyst Services
Offers & Rights Support Service
Investor Relations Services
Alert & Subscription Services
Share Support Services
Proshare Consult
Event & Seminar Coverage
Market Directory
File a Complaint
News & Analysis

News from TheANALYST
Video News from WebTV
Money Market Updates
Opinions & Analysis
Nigerian Economy
Market Data
The Regulator
Discussion Forum

Subscriber Agreement
Privacy Policy
Data Policy
Copyright Policy
Comments in Site
Advertising Code
Conflict of Interest
Content Partnership
3rd Parties

Online Trading and Execution
Legal Support Services
Web/Technology Services
File a Complaint

CBN Governor 2014